Analysis o leadership style and motivation on turnover intention mediated by employee loyalty at PT. WOM finance
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstrak
This study aims to examine the Effect of Competence, Work Motivation, and Workload on Employee Performance with Job Satisfaction as a Mediating Variable for Operations Employees at PT. WOM Finance. The study used a quantitative approach with 268 customer respondents. Data analysis was performed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with the assistance of the SmartPLS 4 application. These three variables are ultimately closely related to employee psychological well-being, one of which is job satisfaction. Consequently, numerous studies have shown that competence, work motivation, and workload not only directly influence performance but are also influenced by job satisfaction as a mediator. Employees who feel satisfied with their work tend to have positive energy and make a greater contribution to the company. The results showed that Work Competence (X1) had a positive and significant effect on Job Satisfaction (Z) with a coefficient of 0.151 and a p-value of 0.001 (<0.05). Work competence also has a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance (Y) with a coefficient value of 0.436 and a p-value of 0.000 (<0.05). The Work Motivation variable (X2) has a positive and significant effect on Job Satisfaction (Z) with a coefficient value of 0.516 and a p-value of 0.000 (<0.05). In addition, Work Motivation also has a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance (Y) with a coefficient value of 0.270 and a p-value of 0.000 (<0.05). Furthermore, Workload (X3) has a negative and insignificant effect on Job Satisfaction (Z) with a coefficient value of -0.132 and a p-value of 0.000 (<0.05). The Job Satisfaction variable (Z) has a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance (Y) with a coefficient value of 0.208 and a p-value of 0.000 (<0.05). Job Competence (X1) has an indirect influence on Employee Performance (Y) through Job Satisfaction (Z) with a coefficient value of 0.031, a T Statistics value of 2.534, and a p-value of 0.011 (<0.05). These results indicate that Job Satisfaction is able to significantly mediate the influence of Job Competence on Employee Performance. Work Motivation (X2) also has an indirect influence on Employee Performance (Y) through Job Satisfaction (Z) with a coefficient value of 0.107, a T Statistics value of 3.906, and a p-value of 0.000 (<0.05). These results indicate that Job Satisfaction is able to significantly mediate the influence of Work Motivation on Employee Performance. Furthermore, Workload (X3) has an indirect effect on Employee Performance (Y) through Job Satisfaction (Z), with a coefficient value of -0.028, a T-statistic of 3.235, and a p-value of 0.001 (<0.05).
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
Referensi
Ahmad. (2021). Job Satisfaction as a Moderator between Work Factors and Employee Performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. Emerald Publishing.
Andriyani, P., Siddiq, D., Hardjowikarto, D., & Elyani, N. D. (2022). Pengaruh kompetensi, motivasi kerja, dan disiplin kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan.
Andi Oh., & Eci Novita. (2016). Pengaruh kompetensi, motivasi, dan kepuasan kerja terhadap produktivitas karyawan pada PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Bangking.
Ardani, N. S., Zulfikar, I., Setyawati, N. F., Siboro, I., & Pratamasari, I. (2024). Analisis Pengaruh Beban Kerja dan Stres Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada PT. Pelabuhan Indonesia (Persero) Regional 4 Balikpapan. Identifikasi, 10(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.36277/identifikasi.v10i1.321
Armstrong, M. (2018). Armstrong’s Handbook of Performance Management. London: Kogan Page.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2018). Multiple levels in job demands-resources theory: Implications for employee well-being and performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. American Psychological Association (APA).
Bandhu, D., et al. (2024). Theories of Motivation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Human Behavior Drivers. Acta Psychologica, 244, Article 104177. Elsevier.
Bernardin, H. J., & Russell, J. E. A. (2013). Human Resource Management: An Experiential Approach (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Darma, P., & Supriyanto. (2020). Intrinsic motivation and employee performance.
Debby Sagita., & Assa, A. F. (2019). Pengaruh kepuasan kerja dan beban kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan PT. Airmas Perkasa.
Desy Afriliani, et al. (2024). Pengaruh kompetensi dan motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja dengan kepuasan kerja sebagai variabel intervening pada Encar Daihatsu Palembang.
Dessler, G. (2020). Human Resource Management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
Febry Puspa Rini, I. B. Udayana Putra, & Ni Made Taman Sari. (2024). The influence of discipline, leadership, and motivation on employee performance at PT BPR Jero Anom Tabanan.
Gazi, et al. (2024). Analyzing the impact of employee job satisfaction on their job behavior in the industrial setting: An analysis from the perspective of job performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 19 (5th ed.). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hajiali. (2022). Determination of work motivation, leadership style, employee competence on job satisfaction and employee performance. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management (GRHRM), 2(1).
Hamid, M. N., et al. (2024). Pengaruh pelatihan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan dengan kompetensi karyawan sebagai variabel mediasi.
Haryanto, V. (2023). Analisis pengaruh motivasi terhadap kinerja karyawan.
Haryati, L., et al. (2025). Analysis of work ethics and workload on job satisfaction impact on employee performance. International Journal of Management Research and Economics.
JISEM. (2024). A meta-analysis of job satisfaction and job performance relationship. Journal of Industrial & Strategic Employment Management (JISEM).
Kosec, T. (2022). Direct and moderating role of job satisfaction on employee well-being and performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.
Kosim, A., et al. (2023). Pengaruh Employee Engagement, Beban Kerja dan Kepuasan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. REMIK: Riset dan E-Jurnal Manajemen Informatika Komputer. https://www.jurnal.polgan.ac.id/index.php/remik/article/view/12079
Luthan, L. (2023). Pengaruh Beban Kerja, Stres Kerja, dan Lingkungan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. Bank 9 Jambi Cabang Kerinci. Al Fiddhoh: Journal of Banking, Insurance, and Finance, 4(2), 119–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32939/fdh.v4i2.2899
Muhammad Nawal Hamid., Mohammad Benny A., & Margi Purnomo. (2024). Pengaruh pelatihan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan dengan kompetensi karyawan sebagai variabel mediasi pada department produksi salah satu perusahaan tambang di Indonesia.
Muhammad Ali Iqbal., Ahmad Badawi Saluy., & Asep Yusuf Hamdani. (2021). The effect of work motivation and work environment on employee performance mediated by job satisfaction at PT ICI Paints Indonesia.
Safia, et al. (2025). Influence of compensation and work motivation on employee performance with job satisfaction as an intervening variable. Journal of Business Management and Economic Development (JBMED).
Shinta Maulina DS., Rudy C. T., & Adrie Frans Assa. (2023). Pengaruh motivasi dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja dimediasi kepuasan kerja.
Siddiq, A. M. (2022). The effect of competence on job satisfaction and its impact on employee performance. Journal of Management Science (JMAS).
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumilat, R. (2025). The effect of competence on employee performance and job satisfaction in service organizations. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Indonesia. Universitas Sam Ratulangi.
Widyatara, A. (2024). Model of the relationship between workload and motivation to employee performance and job satisfaction. Journal La Medihealtico.